Understanding and Deploying LDAP Directory Services (2nd Edition)

Understanding and Deploying LDAP Directory Services > 2. A Brief History of Directories > Directory Services Future

<  BACK CONTINUE  >
153021169001182127177100019128036004029190136140232051053055078209004195016003051114055

Directory Services Future

It is clear that directory services ” especially the open , general-purpose directories based on LDAP ”have a very bright future. We see a number of trends in the directory services marketplace :

  • Metadirectories are emerging as an important directory product category.

  • Directory services are being more tightly integrated with operating systems.

  • Open standards “based directories are making operating systems less important.

  • LDAP is branching out to become a lightweight database access protocol.

  • LDAP directories continue to dominate.

  • Directories are becoming truly ubiquitous.

Each of these important directory trends is discussed in greater detail in the following sections.

Metadirectories as an Important Product Directory Category

Although nearly all new directory service deployments are based on LDAP, most organizations are not starting from scratch with their directory deployment. There are at least a handful and sometimes dozens of proprietary, outdated , or application-specific directories that the new directory service must coexist with. Because these legacy directories are difficult and expensive to replace, organizations are increasingly looking for ways to lower the costs associated with managing these redundant systems. One solution to this management problem is a metadirectory ”a directory service designed to aggregate and help manage a multitude of other systems. This topic is covered in greater detail in Chapter 22, "Directory Coexistence."

Tighter Operating System Integration

Some directory vendors are tying the directory service and operating system tightly together. The most prominent example is the Microsoft Active Directory, which ships with Windows NT 5.0. Many of the operating system functions depend on the directory service, and in turn the directory service depends on the operating system. This kind of integration may make the system as a whole work better, but it has a disadvantage : For Microsoft's customers, the choice of directory service is tied to the choice of operating system. Thus, for different directory vendors, the level of operating system integration pursued and provided varies because of differences in customer base and target applications.

Directories Are Making Operating Systems Less Important

Competing with the previous trend is the fact that, much as the Internet Web browser has diminished the importance of the desktop operating system, open standards “based directories are making network operating systems less important. Many services that were traditionally provided by an operating system, such as service location and naming, are now provided by LDAP directories. Applications can avoid tying themselves to a platform-specific set of APIs, and software vendors can provide a more portable set of tools for customers. More and more, applications ”instead of operating systems ”are driving the deployment of new directory services. When coupled with the emergence of platform- independent operating environments, such as those based on Java, this trend has the potential to significantly change how software applications are written and deployed.

LDAP as a Database Access Protocol

Many applications that have relatively simple database needs are currently written to use a full-blown relational database. Database independence is surprisingly difficult to achieve; although there are several database-independent APIs to choose from, there is no standard protocol for database access. Some independent software vendors and developers within enterprises have discovered that LDAP can provide most of the database functionality needed by their applications. This discovery will broaden LDAP's influence.

LDAP's Continued Dominance

LDAP directories continue to gain momentum and dominate the directory services space. In the standards area, LDAP is also flourishing, and a great deal of energy is being put into LDAPv3 and its extensions. Software vendors, customers, analysts, and users all see the benefits of open standards “based directories. Just as no one buys a Web browser that doesn't understand HTTP and HTML, no one purchases a directory service that does not understand LDAP.

Directories Are Becoming Truly Ubiquitous

Finally, directories are everywhere. They are "moving down the network stack" as vendors of networking switches, routers, and other devices implement LDAP in our network infrastructure. Directories are also "moving up the network stack" and into desktop applications such as Web browsers and word processors.

Millions of people access directories every day from their email clients and Web browsers. Corporate phone directories are among the most popular intranet applications; and, increasingly, server software can't function without a directory service. The powerful forces shaping the directory services landscape come from many sources. Whether you are deploying an LDAP directory service, writing directory services software, directory-enabling a network application or device, or just using directories, you, too, are contributing to the future of directories.

Understanding and Deploying LDAP Directory Services,  2002 New Riders Publishing

<  BACK CONTINUE  >

Index terms contained in this section

databases

         access protocols

                    LDAP as

directories

         future of

                    continued LDAP dominance

                    LDAP as database access protocol

                    making operating systems less important

                    metadirectories 2nd

                    tighter OS integration

          trends 2nd

future of directory services

          continuted LDAP dominance

          LDAP as database access protocol

          making operating systems less important

          metadirectories 2nd

          tighter OS integration

LDAP

          as database access protocol

metadirectories 2nd

operating systems

          directory integration

          directory service takeovers

protocols

         database access

                    LDAP as

trends

          directories 2nd

                    continued LDAP dominance

                    LDAP as database access protocol

                    making operating systems less important

                    metadirectories 2nd

                    tighter OS integration

2002, O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.

Категории