Routing TCP/IP, Volume 1 (2nd Edition)

In the case study "Redistributing IGRP and RIP," the following configuration is given for router Mantle of Figure 11-8:

router rip redistribute igrp 1 metric 5 passive-interface Ethernet1 network 10.0.0.0 ! router igrp 1 redistribute connected redistribute rip default-metric 1000 100 255 1 1500 passive-interface Ethernet0 network 10.0.0.0

Will the RIP domain know about the stub network 192.168.10.0/24 by virtue of the fact that it is redistributed into IGRP, which is then redistributed into RIP?

In Troubleshooting Exercise 1, if the redistribute rip command is eliminated under the IGRP configuration, will the redistribute connected command be sufficient to advertise the RIP domain?

In Example 11-21, why isn't subnet 192.168.3.32/27 tagged as an EIGRP external route?

In Example 11-21, there is a summary route to 192.168.3.0. What caused this entry?

Given the following configuration, will a level-1 router in area 1 know about the summary route?

Router A:

router isis net 01.0001.0000.0c76.5432.00 address-family ipv6 redistribute rip baseball metric-type external summary-prefix 2001:db8:0:20::/62 level-1