Routing TCP[s]IP (Vol. 11998)

In the case study "Redistributing IGRP and RIP," the following configuration is given for router Mantle of Figure 11.18: Will the RIP domain know about the stub network 192.168.10.0/24 by virtue of the fact that it is redistributed into IGRP, which is then redistributed into RIP?

routerrip redistributeigrp1metric5 passive-interfaceEthernet1 network10.0.0.0 ! routerigrp1 redistributeconnected redistributerip default-metric100010025511500 passive-interfaceEthernet0 network10.0.0.0

In Troubleshooting Exercise 1, if the redistribute rip command is eliminated under the IGRP configuration, will the redistribute connected command be sufficient to advertise the RIP domain?

In Figure 11.20, why isn't subnet 192.168.3.32/27 tagged as an EIGRP external route?

In Figure 11.20, there is a summary route to 192.168.3.0. What caused this entry?

In Figure 11.27, why isn't 192.168.1.0/24 in Campanella's routing table?