Managing for Knowledge: HRs Strategic Role
Some of the more common factors that can inhibit knowledge transfer within organisations, together with some possible ways of addressing these tensions are shown in Table 3.1.
| Knowledge transfer tensions | Possible solutions |
|---|---|
| Lack of trust |
|
| Different language and frames of reference |
|
| Perspective held of productive work |
|
| Rewards go to knowledge holders |
|
| Absorptive capacity in receivers of knowledge |
|
| Belief that knowledge relates to certain groups/positions |
|
| Intolerance of mistakes and lack of support when help is needed |
|
Structure
-
Inflexible company structure
-
Fragmented organisation
-
Functional silo mentality
-
Failure to invest in the right systems
People
-
Inertia to change
-
Lack of time
-
Lack of motivation to share
-
Turnover of staff
-
Insufficient attention to inducting new people
Management
-
Fear of giving up power
-
Difficulties of passing on power
-
Unwillingness to challenge company style
One of the other areas that needs to be considered when trying to encourage employees to participate in knowledge management projects is addressing the ‘ What is in it for me?’ question. Which if we unpack this requires thinking about the following questions:
-
How will knowledge management affect me in my current job?
-
Will it make my life at work any easier?
-
Will it affect how I am rewarded?
-
Will it affect my future employment prospects?
-
What will I need to do differently?
There are no simple ‘off the peg’ solutions. Many organisations are having to find solutions which work best for them, through experimentation. Some common themes include: allowing users to drive systems and practices, rather than imposing these from the top; encouraging a sense of playfulness and fun as a way of engaging individuals in knowledge management activities, as well as providing systems which help individuals feel part of a wider community.
Категории