Wireless Internet Handbook: Technologies, Standards, and Applications (Internet and Communications)

14.3 Models

With nT transmit and nR receive antennas, a baseband discrete-time model for the multiantenna channel with frequency-flat fading [18] is

(14.1)

where x is the nT-dimensional vector representing the transmit signal and y is the nR-dimensional received vector. The vector n, containing both thermal noise and interference, is modeled as Gaussian with zero-mean independent components and power σ2 per receive antenna. [19] The channel, in turn, is represented by the (nR nT) random matrix containing the transfer coefficients from each transmit to each receive antenna. For convenience, we choose to factor out the scalar so as to yield a normalized channel H, the second-order moment of whose entries is unity.

We define also the ratio

(14.2)

The transmit power is constrained to some value P and thus

(14.3)

While power control proved to be an essential ingredient in telephony systems, where source rate variability was minimal, in mobile data systems rate adaptation becomes not only an attractive complement, but even a full alternative to power control. [20] Hence, we restrict ourselves to the case where the total transmit power is held constant while the data rate is being adapted.

The thermal noise power per receive antenna is σ2 = N0BF, where N0 is the onesided noise spectral density, B is the signal bandwidth, and F is the receiver noise figure. We set the noise figure to an optimistic value of F = 3 dB and use the noise spectral density corresponding to a standard temperature of 300 K. In line with the 3G framework, the available bandwidth is set to B = 5 MHz.

Within the channel, [21] different levels of randomness exist:

Most wireless systems are equipped with pilots that are needed for synchronization, identification, and a number of other purposes, and which may be used also to obtain an estimate of the channel. Therefore, accurate information about H can be gathered by the receiver. [29] Consequently, throughout the chapter we focus on those scenarios wherein H is known to the receiver. [30] The transmitter, however, is presumed unaware of the state of the channel for otherwise a heavy burden would be placed on the system in terms of fast feedback requirements.

At the receiver, the SINR is given by

(14.5)

We shall concentrate mostly on the downlink, which has the most stringent demands for Internet access, but occasional references to the uplink will be made as well. The analysis of both links is quite similar, with the exception of much tighter transmit power constraints for the uplink, which originates at the terminal. In terms of system structure, a cellular layout with fairly large hexagonal cells is assumed, with every cell partitioned into three equal-sized sectors.

[18]The analysis and results to follow can be extended to the more general case of frequency-selective fading.

[19]While thermal noise is inherently white, interference tends to be spatially colored, and thus its components are not necessarily independent. Nonetheless, for the sake of simplicity the entire vector n can be modeled as white to yield a lower bound on the bandwidth efficiency.

[20]Goldsmith, A.J. and Varaiya, P., Capacity of fading channels with channel side information, IEEE Trans. Information Theory, 1985–1992, Nov. 1997.

[21]Cox, D.C., Universal digital portable radio communications, Proc. IEEE, 75 (4), 436–477, 1987.

[22]European Corporation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research EURO-COST 231, Urban Transmission Loss Models for Mobile Radio in the 900 and 1800 MHz Bands, Revision 2, The Hague, Sept. 1991.

[23]Cox, D.C., Universal digital portable radio communications, Proc. IEEE, 75 (4), 436–477, 1987.

[24]The base station and terminal heights are set to 35 and 2 m, respectively. The path gain can be adjusted for other types of environment and frequency bands.

[25]Channels that are non-Gaussian and behave abnormally may in theory occur. (*Chizhik, D. et al., Keyholes, Correlations and capacities of multielement transmit-and-receive antennas, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 2 (1), 361–368, 2002.), (**Dietrich, C.B. Jr. et al., Spatial, polarization, and pattern diversity for wireless handheld terminals, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation, 49 (9), 1271–1281, 2001.)

[26]Local scattering around the base stations would only reinforce the model.

[27]Chu, T.-S. and Greenstein, L.J., A semiempirical representation of antenna diversity gain at cellular and PCS base stations, IEEE Trans. Commun., 45–46, June 1997.

[28]Gesbert, D. et al., MIMO Wireless Channels: Capacity and Performance Prediction, Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM'00, San Francisco, Dec. 2000.

[29]Marzetta, T.L., BLAST Training: Estimating Channel Characteristics for High Capacity Space-Time Wireless, Proc. 37th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Monticello, Illinois, Sept. 1999.

[30]If the channel changes so rapidly that it cannot be properly estimated, a different class of multiantenna techniques based on differential encoding can be applied. (*Marzetta, T.L. and Hochwald, B.H., Capacity of a mobile multiple-antenna communication link in Rayleigh flat fading, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 45 (1), 139–157, 1999.), (**Hochwald, B.H. and Marzetta, T.L., Unitary space-time modulation for multiple-antenna communications in Rayleigh flat fading, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 46, 543–564, Mar. 2000.), (***Hassibi, B., Cayley Codes for Multiple-Antenna Differential Modulation, Proc. Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Pacific Grove, California, Vol. 1, Nov. 2001.) Although inferior in potential to the coherent techniques discussed in the chapter, these schemes could be relevant to certain services and applications such as high-speed trains, etc.

Категории