Handbook of Cancer Chemotherapy

Editors: Skeel, Roland T.

Title: Handbook of Cancer Chemotherapy, 7th Edition

Copyright 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

> Table of Contents > Section III - Chemotherapy of Human Cancer > Chapter 18 - Bone Sarcomas

Chapter 18

Bone Sarcomas

Robert S. Benjamin

There are four major sarcomas of bone, each differing somewhat in clinical behavior, chemotherapy responsiveness, and prognosis. All present as painful bony lesions, and all metastasize preferentially to lung and then to other bones. The prognosis of untreated sarcomas of the bone is inversely proportional to their chemotherapy responsiveness. The sarcomas are considered in order of greatest to least chemotherapeutic responsiveness: Ewing's sarcoma, osteosarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone, and chondrosarcoma.

Response to treatment is evaluated according to the usual criteria used for solid tumors and identical to that reported in Chapter 17. Angiography is particularly helpful in defining the response of primary bone tumors to chemotherapy, and the angiographic response correlates well with pathologic tumor destruction. Complete resection and examination of the total specimen are often required to determine response to therapy in a primary or even a metastatic lesion and to confirm complete remission.

I. Staging

Bone tumors are staged according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) criteria as well as the criteria of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society.

A. The AJCC staging system

The stage is determined by tumor grade, tumor size, and presence and sites of metastases.

There are four tumor grades.

Ewing's sarcoma is classified as G4 Tumor size is divided as less than or equal to 8 cm. Tumor size determines A and B substages of stages I and II, and stage III.

Metastatic status is subdivided by presence and location of metastases.

P.434

The AJCC stage grouping is as follows:

Stage IA G1 2 T1 N0 M0
Stage IA G1 2 T2 N0 M0
Stage IIA G3 4 T1 N0 M0
Stage IIB G3 4 T2 N0 M0
Stage III Any G T3 N0 M0
Stage IVA Any G Any T N0 M1a
Stage IVB Any G Any T Any N M1b (includes N1)

B. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) staging system

The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society stages sarcomas according to grade and compartmental localization.

The Roman numeral reflects the tumor grade.

The companion letter reflects tumor compartmentalization.

C.

Thus, a stage IA tumor is a low-grade tumor confined to bone, and a stage IB tumor is a low-grade tumor extending into soft tissue, and so forth. Patients are evaluated and followed up according to the plan in Table 18.1.

II. Ewing's sarcoma

A. General considerations and aims of therapy

Table 18.1. Primary bone sarcoma evaluation

Testsa Before Therapy On Initial Treatment Preoperative On Subsequent Treatment Follow-up
History and physical examination X Before each treatment X Before each treatment Year 1: q2 months; years 2, 3: q3 4 months; year 4: q4 months; year 5: q6 months; then yearly
CBC, differential, and platelet countsb X Twice weekly X Twice weekly Yearly
Chemistry profileb X Before each treatment X Before each treatment Year 1: q4 6 months; then yearly
Calculated creatinine clearance X For methotrexate For methotrexate
Electrolytes, Mgb X Before each treatment X Before each treatment
Urinalysis If ifosfamide is given As indicated by symptoms X Before each treatment
PT, APTT, fibrinogen X Before each IA treatment and daily while on IA treatment X
Plain films of primary tumor X Every two cycles X q3 months Year 1: q4 6 months; then yearly
CT of primary tumor X After two to four cycles X At end of treatment for head and neck or pelvic primaries
MRI of primary tumor For surgical planning only
Bone scan X
PET-CTc X After two to four cycles If needed to assess response
Chest radiograph X Before each treatment X Before each treatment Year 1: q2 months; years 2, 3: q3 4 months; year 4: q4 months; year 5: q6 months; then yearly
Chest CT X If chest radiograph is equivocal, to assess response, or for surgical planning If chest radiograph is equivocal, to assess response, or for surgical planning If chest radiograph is equivocal or for surgical planning
Angiogram Before each preoperative treatment
Bone marrow Only for small cell tumors with metastases
ECG If cardiac history is present If cardiac history is present
Cardiac scan If cardiac history is present If doxorubicin dose exceeds standard limits for schedule
Central venous catheter X
Bone tumor conference X If further multidisciplinary decisions are required
CBC, complete blood cell count; PT, prothrombin time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; AI, intra-arterial; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET, positron emission tomography; ECG, electrocardiogram; X, procedure to be done; , procedure not needed.

aTests may be ordered more frequently based on clinical indications.

bRequired more frequently if patient is on a medical treatment program.

cProcedure is suggested but optional.

B. Chemotherapy

The most effective primary chemotherapy regimens include vincristine, doxorubicin, and ifosfamide (high-dose VAI) or cyclophosphamide (VAdriaC), with or without the addition of dacarbazine (CyVADIC). In most cases where ifosfamide is not used in the primary treatment, ifosfamide and etoposide are added in an alternating fashion or after completion of the doxorubicin-based regimen.

III. Osteosarcoma

A. General considerations

Osteosarcoma is a tumor with a poor prognosis in the absence of effective chemotherapy. It is the most common primary bone sarcoma. Frequently, it affects patients 10 to 25 years old and tends to be located around the knee in approximately two thirds of patients, with two thirds of those tumors involving the distal aspect of the femur. As with other sarcomas of bone, pulmonary metastases are most common, followed by bone metastases. Because conventional osteosarcoma is a high-grade tumor by definition and is accompanied by a soft tissue mass in 90% or more of patients, it is usually staged as IIB or IIIB, (MSTS), depending on the demonstration of metastatic disease in lung or bone.

B. Role of chemotherapy

Chemotherapy is usually employed in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant situation, and its value preoperatively has been conclusively demonstrated. Patients who show a complete response to preoperative chemotherapy with tumor destruction of at least 90% have significantly improved survival. Response rates in evaluable tumors range from 30% to 80%. Cure of primary disease with adjuvant chemotherapy is 50% to 80%.

C. Effective agents

The four major standard single agents in the treatment of osteosarcoma are cisplatin, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and high-dose methotrexate. In addition, the combination of bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and dactinomycin (BCD) has been effective.

D. Recommended regimen

A variety of regimens may be recommended based on preliminary or more extensive evaluation.

E. Special precautions in administration

F. Complications

Complications of chemotherapy depend on the drugs. For doxorubicin, the major complication is infection owing to neutropenia. Other complications include stomatitis, nausea and vomiting, and delayed cardiac toxicity, as discussed in the management of soft tissue sarcomas (see Chapter 17, Section II.E). Ifosfamide produces

P.443

myelosuppression, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia, similar to doxorubicin. Hemorrhagic cystitis, once the dose-limiting toxicity, is rarely seen because the use of mesna has become routine. The most serious toxicities of ifosfamide are nephrotoxicity and CNS toxicity. Nephrotoxicity in the form of Fanconi syndrome is a frequent problem, the morbidity of which can be minimized by the routine use of alkaline infusions and correction of electrolyte levels with intravenous or oral replacement therapy. Only rarely does the nephrotoxicity progress to renal failure, often precipitated by dehydration or administration of minimally nephrotoxic drugs such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Patients treated with ifosfamide should be instructed to avoid NSAIDs, even years after chemotherapy. Correction of acid base balance and hypoalbuminemia can essentially prevent the CNS toxicity (see Chapter 17, Section II.E). Dactinomycin causes side effects similar to those of doxorubicin, but not cardiac toxicity. Methotrexate predominantly causes stomatitis, but it may cause myelosuppression and renal, hepatic, and CNS abnormalities. Cisplatin and dacarbazine cause severe nausea and vomiting. In addition, cisplatin nephrotoxicity is primarily a tubular defect, with hypomagnesemia as the most prominent manifestation, but hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, and hyponatremia also occur. Delayed cumulative nephrotoxicity can cause impaired glomerular function as well. Ototoxicity may occur but is less common. Delayed neurotoxicity also occurs. Both cisplatin and methotrexate can, by causing renal toxicity, exacerbate their other side effects.

G. Recurrence and treatment of refractory disease

Patients with osteosarcoma who are refractory to a combination of doxorubicin and cisplatin may respond to high-dose methotrexate; patients refractory to high-dose methotrexate may respond to doxorubicin plus cisplatin; and patients refractory to both may respond to ifosfamide or, rarely, to BCD. However, treatment of refractory disease is usually disappointing, and participation in studies of new agents is indicated for patients whose disease cannot be resected. Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases remains the only viable secondary therapy for most patients. For this reason, careful follow-up for detection of metastases while they are still at the stage of resectability is indicated.

H. High-dose chemotherapy

The standard chemotherapy used for osteosarcoma is accompanied by severe but transient myelosuppression. The availability of hematopoietic growth factors to reduce infectious complications provides an added measure of safety but is not routinely required. Our policy has been to use growth factors only for regimens known to cause febrile neutropenia in equal to or more than 30% of patients or in patients who have had febrile neutropenic episodes during a previous course of chemotherapy rather than to reduce the doses of the myelosuppressive drugs.

Bone marrow transplantation or peripheral stem cell rescue programs have not been demonstrated to improve prognosis.

IV. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone

This entity, characterized by a purely lytic lesion in bone, has an exceptionally poor prognosis when treated with surgery alone, although

P.444

the number of reported patients is small. It may be extremely difficult to distinguish from fibroblastic osteosarcoma and may be best considered as a fibroblastic osteosarcoma with minimal (i.e., no detectable) osteoid production. The tumor responds well to the CyADIC regimen for soft tissue sarcomas, with more than half the number of patients obtaining at least partial remission. In addition, cisplatin at a dose of 120 mg/m2 every 4 weeks has caused remissions, even in patients who did not respond to primary therapy. A particularly attractive approach for patients with large, unresectable primary tumors is the administration of cisplatin by the intra-arterial route. Complete tumor destruction in one patient and a good partial remission in a second patient are the reported results among three patients so treated. Systemic doxorubicin may be added, as for osteosarcomas (see Section III.D.1). Alternatively, responses have been seen after high-dose methotrexate-based regimens for osteosarcomas (see Section III.D.2). After local tumor destruction, surgery may be employed to remove residual disease. Because of the poor prognosis, adjuvant chemotherapy with the continuous-infusion CyADIC regimen is recommended until an 800-mg/m2 cumulative doxorubicin dose has been reached.

V. Chondrosarcoma

The chemotherapy for chondrosarcoma is totally inadequate, and no regimen can be recommended except for the rare patients with mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, a subtype that may respond to CyADIC chemotherapy or cisplatin, or with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma, which should be treated the same way as osteosarcoma. Most patients have conventional chondrosarcoma and are candidates only for surgical management. Metastatic disease should be treated with phase II protocols in an attempt to determine some effective type of chemotherapy that may be recommended in the future.

Suggested Readings

Bacci G, Briccoli A, Ferrari S, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the extremity: long-term results of the Rizzoli's 4th protocol. Eur J Cancer 2001;37:2030 2039.

Bacci G, Ferrari S, Bertoni F, et al. Prognostic factors in nonmetastatic Ewing's sarcoma of bone treated with adjuvant chemotherapy: analysis of 359 patients at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:4 11.

Bacci G, Ferrari S, Bertoni F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for peripheral malignant neuroectodermal tumor of bone: recent experience at the Istituto Rizzoli. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:885 892.

Bacci G, Ferrari S, Longhi A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade osteosarcoma of the extremities: long-term results for patients treated according to the Rizzoli IOR/OS-3b protocol. J Chemother 2001;13:93 99.

Benjamin RS, Murray JA, Carrasco CH, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy for osteosarcoma: a treatment approach facilitating limb salvage with major prognostic implications. In: Jones SE, Salmon SE, eds. Adjuvant therapy of cancer, Vol. IV. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1984:601 610.

Bone sarcoma. In: Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, eds. AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 2002:187 192.

P.445

Chawla SP, Benjamin RS, Abdul-Karim FW, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy of primary malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone: prolongation of disease free and overall survival. In: Jones SE, Salmon SE, eds. Adjuvant therapy of cancer, Vol. IV. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1984:621 629.

Gehan EA, Sutow WW, Uribe-Botero G, et al. Osteosarcoma: the M. D. Anderson experience, 1950 1974. In: Terry WD, Windhorst D, eds. Immunotherapy of cancer: present status of trials in man. New York: Raven Press, 1978.

Grier H, Krailo M, Link M, et al. Improved outcome in non-metastatic Ewing's sarcoma (EWS) and PNET of bone with the addition of ifosfamide (D) and etoposide (E) to vincristine (W), Adriamycin (Ad), cyclophosphamide (C), and actinomycin (A): a Children's Cancer Group (CCG) and Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) report. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1994;13:A1443.

Kushner BH, Meyers PA, Gerald WL, et al. Very-high-dose short-term chemotherapy for poor-risk peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors, including Ewing's sarcoma in children and young adults. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:2796 2804.

Rosen G, et al. The successful management of metastatic osteogenic sarcoma: a model for the treatment of primary osteogenic sarcoma. In: van Oosterom AT, Muggia FM, Cleton FJ, eds. Therapeutic progress in ovarian cancer, testicular cancer and the sarcomas. Hingham: Leiden University Press, 1990:244 265.

Категории