Six Sigma Fundamentals: A Complete Introduction to the System, Methods, and Tools

Six sigma methodology demands quantification of improvement. In order for that quantification to materialize there must exist in the organization a system for identifying the cost associated with problems, inefficiencies and, in general, customer dissatisfaction. As it turns out, the system most often responsible for such tracking is called cost of quality (COQ). With COQ in any organization (manufacturing and non-manufacturing alike) quality and improvement may be measured at the same time. However, within the COQ, there are two categories that define the structure and reporting of that cost. They are:

These two categories comprise the two operating curves used for achieving the break-even point of the quality costs break-even chart. Avoidance costs and total failure costs are broken down further into two categories:

These avoidance cost categories are, in the case of appraisal costs, expected to discover and correct problems after the problems surface. On the other hand, prevention costs are intended to be applied before the fact of producing defective product, to prevent the defective product from being produced.

It is beyond the scope of this book to address the details for constructing a quality cost reporting system. However, a simple and practical approach is to start with a review of the company's "Chart of Accounts" to determine which of those accounts should be selected and to which quality cost category those selected accounts should be assigned. Table 4.10 gives a cursory view of the most standard form based on a typical chart of accounts. By identifying each of the accounts, the reader of the report can see the influence of these costs to the total cost of the organization and, as a result, an appropriate management decision will be made to reduce the out-of-line cost. What is important about the form is the fact that it has two time periods for comparison purposes. The reason for the two periods is to evaluate progress. It is the performance difference (variance, in the language of cost of quality) of the two periods that establishes the improvement trend.

Table 4.10: A typical cost of quality report

Time period A

Time period B

Difference

Appraisal costs

Account 1

Account 2

Account 3

Account n

Prevention costs

Account 1

Account 2

Account 3

Account n

Internal failure costs

Account 1

Account 2

Account 3

Account n

External failure costs

Account 1

Account 2

Account 3

Account n

Категории