Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Terminal Services

Just as for other complex technologies, the introduction of terminal servers fails in many companies. Frequently, it is not technical issues but rather the organizational issues that result in unsatisfactory solutions. Still, users do not care about the reason for failure ”they care about the impact on their everyday work. If production work becomes impossible , system administrators and management will be affected, too. Acceptance can drop to zero, even for a technology with a great concept. This failure can even cast doubt on an entire corporate strategy.

To help avoid organizational or conceptual mistakes, we will briefly examine project planning and, the selection of a system integrator plus we will discuss establishing guidelines to avoid mistakes.

Project Planning

So what is the difference between a successful and a failed terminal server project? The technology itself works, as has been proved, just not under all circumstances. No one expects a sports car to be perfectly suited to all tasks in construction or manufacturing. A four-wheel-drive truck would be a lot better for these tasks , although their basic structure (a vehicle with four tires and a steering wheel) doesn t differ much from a sports car. The same is true for terminal servers. They are better suited for some tasks than for others. Finding out which areas of a company terminal servers can be effectively used and implementing successfully, from a technical point of view is the objective of a terminal server project.

Terminal server projects are typically divided into five phases. Either an internal or an external service provider normally handles the implementation of such a project.

Each of the above phases is concluded with a milestone. This milestone represents the end of the phase and determines whether the project will go on or be aborted. All criteria regarding the following step need to be set in the specifications from at least the planning phase on.

If weaknesses in the project concept become evident during the pilot or field- test phase, it will be necessary to backtrack to the planning phase. Even though this might lead to deadline attainment problems, this procedure will prevent a system that does not work properly from being transitioned to the production phase. Once in the production phase, conceptual mistakes can no longer be corrected and usually lead to catastrophic results.

Important  

Mistakes happen in every project! The earlier they are identified and solved , the less problematic they are. For this reason, efficient escalation management is essential for the success of a project. Determining corresponding procedures and defining project abortion criteria in the specifications is therefore essential.

Selection of the System Integrator

What is the difference between a TV and a toaster on one hand, and a corporate server and a mainframe computer on the other? The former category can be used by untrained persons without any technical introduction. The latter category is based on technology that needs to be explained and should therefore be set up and operated only by specialists. These specialists must have undergone extensive training and acquired a great deal of experience.

Naturally, the world is not black and white. There are so many nuances , and this also goes for the technological categories described earlier. Skillful operation of a sophisticated VCR or motor vehicle requires comprehensive studying of manuals or attending special practical training. After completing their studies and/or training, normal people can use these devices. Due to improved user interfaces, setting up and using a PC is becoming common knowledge. However, in large companies, this can lead to a fatal mixture: untrained staff operating seemingly easy-to-use but at the same time company-critical technology that actually needs to be explained.

The self-made administrator problem is especially obvious in corporate networks with terminal servers. Because of its graphical administration tools, an application server configured as a terminal server at first glance seems to be easy to operate . However, this computer as a host that has many terminals connected to it requires relevant in-depth knowledge. If several terminal servers are combined for load balancing to provide an environment for multiple users, the corresponding administration task is anything but trivial. For this reason, system integrators assist with installing, training administrators, and operating a terminal server environment.

So what services should be considered for the introduction and production use of this type of environment? What does a good system integrator offer? Usually, five selection criteria are essential: consulting, installation, support during operation, training sessions, and support tools combined with effective project management. Let us take a closer look at these criteria.

Implementation of the criteria listed earlier often requires highly specialized personnel to reach the targets set for the installation of terminal servers. Before you decide on your terminal server project provider, ask all potential system integrators about their products and general conditions relating to the preceding issues and about the availability of the required personnel. Only when suitable staff can cover all relevant areas is the probability of project success high enough to warrant implementation. Also, it is always legitimate to ask a system integrator for on-topic publications and strategic partnerships with the producers of the system software.

Tip  

When drawing up a server-based computing concept for your company, always focus on the human aspect . This includes the management, administrators, and, of course, the users. If these three groups do not accept the strategy, even the best technical concept can only lead to unsatisfactory results. If these people do not sufficiently accept the solution offered , achieving the discipline initially required for the use of Windows terminal servers will be difficult. System stability will never be reached if the exclusive administration of the Windows terminal server by trained administrators and the terminal server s explicit treatment as a vital corporate component are not ensured.

Категории