Wireless Communication Systems: Advanced Techniques for Signal Reception (paperback)
3.6.1 Proofs for Section 3.3.1
Proof of Theorem 3.1
Denote Equation 3.231
The differential of the form II group -blind detector, Equation 3.232
is then given by Equation 3.233
It then follows from Lemma 2.6 that Equation 3.234
with Equation 3.235
Equation 3.236
Therefore, the asymptotic covariance of Equation 3.237
It is easily verified that QY u 1 = . Using this and the facts that w 1 = Y u 1 and QU n = U n , by substituting (3.234) into (3.237), we obtain (3.61). Proof of Corollary 3.1
In this appendix e k denotes the k th unit vector in Equation 3.238
Denote Equation 3.239
Equation 3.240
Equation 3.241
Equation 3.242
First we compute the term tr ( C w C r ). Using (3.61) and the facts that Equation 3.243
The term ( Equation 3.244
Using the fact that Equation 3.245
To compute the second term in (3.243), first note that Equation 3.246
where the first equality follows from the fact that QY Equation 3.247
where we used the fact that YXY = Y . In (3.246) Equation 3.248
Equation 3.249
Substituting (3.247) and (3.249) into (3.246) we obtain the second term in (3.243): Equation 3.250
Finally, we compute t in the last term in (3.243). By definition, Equation 3.251
where Equation 3.252
Equation 3.253
Equation 3.254
with Equation 3.255
Moreover, we have Equation 3.256
Next we compute w 1 2 . Since Equation 3.257
Equation 3.258
we have Equation 3.259
By (3.255) “(3.259) we obtain the corollary. SINR Calculation for Example 2
Substituting (2.338) “(2.340) and A 2 = A 2 I K into (3.66) “(3.68), we have Equation 3.260
Equation 3.261
Equation 3.262
Equation 3.263
Equation 3.264
where Equation 3.265
Equation 3.266
Equation 3.267
Equation 3.268
Equation 3.269
Equation 3.270
Substituting (3.265) “(3.270) into (3.69) “(3.72), and letting Equation 3.271
Equation 3.272
Equation 3.273
Equation 3.274
Equation 3.275
we obtain (3.82). 3.6.2 Proofs for Section 3.3.2
Proof of Theorem 3.2
We prove this theorem for the case of a linear group-blind hybrid detector (i.e., Denote e k as the k th unit vector in Equation 3.276
For any Equation 3.277
Equation 3.278
Equation 3.279
Denote Equation 3.280
Equation 3.281
where the dimension of Equation 3.282
Let the eigendecomposition of [1] The eigenvalues are unchanged by similarity transformations. Equation 3.283
Define another orthogonal transformation, Equation 3.284
For any Equation 3.285
Equation 3.286
Equation 3.287
Equation 3.288
Furthermore, after rotation, Equation 3.289
for some Equation 3.290
where E s consists of the first Equation 3.291
Let the corresponding eigendecomposition of Equation 3.292
Then the estimated detector in the same coordinate system is given by
Note that in such a rotated coordinate system, estimation error occurs only in the first Equation 3.293
Equation 3.294
Hence Equation 3.295
By Lemma 2.6, Equation 3.296
We next compute the three terms T 1 , T 2 , and T 3 in (3.296). We first compute T 1 . Denote z k and x k as the subvectors of Equation 3.297
with Equation 3.298
Equation 3.299
The term T 2 can be computed following a similar derivation as in the proof of Theorem 1 for the DMI blind detector. Specifically, we have, similar to (2.302), Equation 3.300
Writing (3.300) in matrix form, we have Equation 3.301
with Equation 3.302
Hence the second term in (3.296) is Equation 3.303
where we have used the fact that Finally, we calculate T 3 . Denote Equation 3.304
As before, we only have to consider [ T 3 ] i,j for i,j Equation 3.305
Writing this in matrix form, we have Equation 3.306
Equation 3.307
Hence the third term in (3.296) is given by Equation 3.308
Substituting (3.297), (3.303), and (3.308) into (3.296), we obtain Equation 3.309
where D 1 and D 2 are given, respectively, by (3.299) and (3.302), and t is given by (3.298). Theorem 3 is now easily obtained by transforming (3.309) back to the original coordinate system according to the following mappings: |